Liver abscess after liver metastasectomy is a poor prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: More and more complications of extensive hepatic resection are being encountered in patients treated for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. This study aimed to determine the impact of liver abscess after hepatic resection on overall survival (OS) and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 252 patients treated by liver metastasectomy between 2001 and 2010. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 55.8%. Twenty-one (8.3%) patients developed liver abscess after liver metastasectomy. Multivariate analysis identified the size of liver metastasis, surgical margin, and the presence of liver abscess as significant prognostic factors. Patients (whether or not they developed liver abscess after hepatic resection) had similar progression-free survival (median, 9.8 vs. 12.4 months, P = 0.476), but patients who developed liver abscess had significantly shorter OS (26.6 vs. 76.0 months, P = 0.004). Subsequent adjuvant therapy significantly improved OS in these patients (16.9 vs. 38.5 months, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Liver abscess after liver metastasectomy is an independent prognostic factor, and adjuvant chemotherapy is warranted in those patients who develop liver abscess.

Stage IV thymic carcinoma: a study of 20 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to investigate the clinical factors, tumor characteristics, treatment approach, and prognosis of patients with Stage IV thymic carcinoma (WHO type C). METHODS: The records of 20 patients with histologically confirmed thymic carcinoma treated between 1988 and 2002 at the Division of Oncology at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were reviewed. RESULTS: Therapy consisted of surgical debulking, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in six patients (30%), surgical debulking with adjuvant chemotherapy in two patients (10%), surgical debulking with adjuvant radiotherapy in one patient (5%), radiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy in eight patients (40%), and chemotherapy alone in three patients (15%). After a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 5-72 months), three patients (15%) were alive. Eighteen patients (90%) experienced disease recurrence after a median of 9 months (range, 2-41 months); 12 (66%) of these patients initially had stage IVa disease, and 6 (33%) had stage IV b disease. Five patients had an undifferentiated type of histology. The median time to progression was 5 months. However, none of these patients was able to receive salvage therapy due to their poor performance status. For those patients with a lymphoepithelioma-like histology, the median survival was 36 months; there was tumor recurrence in five patients and they all received salvage chemotherapy. The median survival time for these five patients was 51 months. For patients with squamous cell type, the median time to progression was 10 months. Five patients received salvage chemotherapy and the median survival was 28 months. There was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the median survival between those who received chemotherapy (18 months) after tumor relapse and those who did not (1 month). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that multidisciplinary treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is beneficial in treating primary thymic carcinoma. Chemotherapy plays an important role in both primary and relapsed stage IV thymic carcinoma in terms of prolonging the disease-free survival and median survival of patients with lymphoepithelioma-like or squamous cell histology types. For patients with an undifferentiated histology, multidisciplinary treatment or chemotherapy might not be helpful in either primary or relapsed stage IV thymic carcinoma.